Eng Essay 1

Eng Essay 1 Eng Essay 1 Donald Cornell Mrs. Laura Ahmed English 3A-04 Arguing a Position Due: 2/3/15 In this world we live in there many mysterious forces that as humans we cannot understand. One of the things in this world we have yet to understand is fate or destiny. Some people believe in it some people don’t. Some people don’t even know what fate is. Fate is defined by the dictionary as â€Å"the universal principle or ultimate agency by which the order of things is presumably prescribed; the decreed cause of events.† Destiny is defined by the dictionary as â€Å"the predetermined, usually inevitable or irresistible course of events.† Even though the definitions are clear and are in the English dictionary, these two principles are not believed by everyone. Strange though, because this not what most people will argue over when discussing fate and/or destiny. People usually will argue whether or not they control their own destiny or fate, or if it is already been decided for you by god. Personally, I think free will determines our fate by ou r actions and decisions that humans make throughout their life and god would play a role in the decision making and the actions humans take. Another thing a lot of people will argue about when it comes to the subject of fate and destiny is fatalism. Fatalism according to the dictionary is â€Å"the belief that events fixed by fate/destiny are unchangeable by any type of human agency.† Meaning, humans can have no effects upon their own fates or upon the fate of others. One of the most common places you will find examples of fatalism is the bible. Fate or Destiny does not exist in the bible they only referred to it as â€Å"god’s plan for you† or â€Å"god’s will.† Not only did the civilizations of the bible era believed this but a lot of other ancient peoples believed that decisions and actions ultimately went according to a divine plan devised by god, even free will. Followers of Christianity consider God to be the only force with control over oneà ¢â‚¬â„¢s fate, meaning that he is responsible for good as well as evil and misfortune. On the other hand, there are many people in the world that believe that we as people control our own fate or destiny and not god. God would play an equal role in their decision making and actions that will determine they’re fate. They also believe that if you want to, and have the will to, you can change your fate. For example: there have been many poor homeless people on the street, but every now and again someone decides to change that fate, and the next time you see that person, they could have a whole different life, because that person used free will to overcome his or hers fate. There are other people in this world that are born into their fates. What I mean by this is that when someone is born into an old family with a family business, most likely that person is going to work in that family business. Or for example a Senator’s son is born and it is his first and only son, most likely the father would want the son to be more like him and would probably

German Teenage Slang

German Teenage Slang The following is a handful of German slang that can be heard at times from teenagers. Keep in mind that not all German teenagers speak this way and that slang may vary from region to region.   A-L ugeln - to flirtabgallen - to throw upAmateurlocken - matted hairAtze - buddyBarrio - hang-out placeBD - stupidbuggi - to not care (Das ist buggi - Es ist mir egal – I don’t care)Bà ¼ffelbude - schoolchillen - to chill, relaxcremig - coolDrahtfresse - teenager with bracesDrinni someone who stays home all the timedissent - to get upsetdullie - dumb personEmo - from Emotional Hardcore Punk, signifies an emotional personfitnieren - to train in a fitness centerfriedhofsblond - gray-hairedFresskick - eating frenzyfroggy - crazygediegen - coolgruscheln - comes from grà ¼ÃƒÅ¸en (greet) and kuscheln (cuddle)Gà ¼llebunker - toiletHasenhirn - an idiotHeulsuse - woman that cries a lotHirni - an idiotHomie - buddyHood - neighbourhoodIkeakind - a Swedeimba - cooljedn - auf jeden Fall – absolutely/ of courseKackpappe - toilet paperknorke - awesomeKà ¶rperklaus - clumsy, awkward personKP - kein PlanLabertasche - blabbermouthlolen – to laugh out loudlush - cool M - Z Mcdreamy - Prince CharmingMOF - Mensch ohne Freunde – Person without friendsmà ¶bt - nerve-rackingMcDonalds – overgrown eyebrowsmegamßig – super bigOmega – loseroverlappt – totally uncoolphat – very goodrolexen – to boastSchnaddadeng! – Here, look!swag - very cooltrollig – dumbUnderbomber – underwearunst – coolvolle Mà ¶hre – awesomewambo – grosszappo – the end Also check out an overview of German youth slang over the 20th century by Spiegel.de

Career Development Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Career Development - Assignment Example Self-efficacy refers to one’s belief in his own abilities. Extensive research has been conducted in order to evaluate the impact of predominant belief in academic performance and overall personality of a person. A usually observation indicates that those students who believe that they would not be able to perform better on tests, often times fail in doing so. However, those having potent belief over their skills and abilities usually outperform others. The reason is because self-efficacy is deeply linked with cognitive development of a person (Bandura, 1977). A large number of researches have proven that there is a substantial positive relationship between the academic performance and self-efficacy beliefs of students. Self-efficacy impacts the activities that students perform, as well as their persistence and extent of efforts. Persistence and putting more effort is difficult task or difficult times are what sets the successful students apart (Bryon, 2011). Therefore, the aim of this paper is to improve own self-efficacy skills. In order to do so, certain strategies and activities have been designed. Results must be evaluated after a period of time so as to compare the past and the current performance. According to Bandura, and Adams, (1977) people possessing low self-esteem tend to shun tasks whereas those who have high self-efficacy not just attempt the task but also remain persistence and competent towards that task (Bandura and Adams, 1977). Figure 1 mentioned above is an example of personal development plan that has been prepared in order to develop and furnish own self-efficacy skills. It must be borne in mind that self-efficacy primarily constitutes of three major areas that include self-confidence, academic performance, and employability skills. However, a lot of effort is required in the beginning. For improving in each area, certain activities are needed to be performed. For example,

Gender and Women's Studies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Gender and Women's Studies - Assignment Example The relevance of Myth of Scarcity to Gender & Women’s Studies relates to the manner in which the men respond to crises, blaming the women, who are incapacitated, for not taking part in solution finding (Rosie the Riveters of World War II). b) An example of White privilege at work is the ability of a white rapper like Eminem to market himself through alternative radio stations such as rock, rap, RnB and pop, whereas the black counterparts seldom receive airplay outside the realm of rap. c) The relevance of White privilege to Gender & Women’s Studies is the manner in which feminine traits are deemed weak. As a result, women end up being paid less than men for performing identical work are. For instance, male clothing designers and chefs are paid more than their female counterparts are (SCWAMP 7). a) Definition: A term used to describe the tactics that are used to make oppression successful by involving the victim in it. The victim is confined in a negative image and message environment, victim hating and violence, with a result of self-blaming and low self-esteem (Pharr 59). c) The Relevance of Blaming the Victim to Gender & Women’s Studies is when the male workers blame the female counterparts for not performing as much as them, as it was the case in the World War II (Rosie the Riveters of World War II). a) Definition: A term used to describe the phenomenon in which the oppressor leads the victim of oppression into believing his or her negative views, with a result of self-hatred, which can be expressed through self-abuse, despair and depression (Pharr 60). a) Definition: A term used to describe the tendency of a member of an oppressed group, who has been led to self-hatred through internalized oppression, to express hatred, prejudice and even lacking hope for the group and its members (Critical Terms Sheet). b) Horizontal Hostility takes place when women, who have been rape victims before, condemn all the subsequent rape victims, terming them as agents

Mcl restaurant Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Mcl restaurant - Research Paper Example Top-level managers giving instruction to their immediate subordinates what is referred to as a chain of command characterizes this organization structure. In this line organization structure, the managers can also delegate part of their functions to their subordinates while remaining responsible for their actions. Decentralization is further embraced in the line structure whereby there are managers responsible for the various departments of the restaurant. MCL organization follows a function wise department in which similar tasks are brought together. This kind of departmentalization is a reflection of the functions of the organization, follows the principles of specialization, and promotes control by the top managers. Task oriented departmentalization is also simple to understand in addition to the improvement in efficiency in the business. Functional departmentalization ensures easier communication and eradicates duplication of functions. However, functional departmentalization causes the risk of overspecialization and concentration on the departmental objectives rather than the general organizations goals (Griffin & Moorehead 78). This may hamper the realization of the overall objectives of the business. It might also be characterized by communication breakdown between the organizations different functions. MCL organization structure supports its strategy by promoting efficient communication, determines the execution of roles with the aim of ensuring organizations success. The structure also makes the organization respond to the changes in the environment and pursue new ways of achieving objectives. Moreover, the structure defines how work is done and coordinated hence eradicating

Theoretical Perspectives as Rituals of Power and Knowledge Essay Example for Free

Theoretical Perspectives as Rituals of Power and Knowledge Essay â€Å"Pornography is a panoptic function. It is everything watch by a mechanical eye†¦Optics is the genius of the West, and voyeurism is its major mechanism of control.† Monica Sjoo and Barbara Mor, The Great Cosmic Mother, p. 328. In order to begin to understand â€Å"panoptic functions,† such as the function of pornography as expressed in the headlining quote, one must understand these functions as structures for generalization, in order to later deconstruct deeper and more hidden meanings. In this sense, theoretical perspectives are always selective, yet it is within this selectivity that we can begin to unearth very deeply layered psychological and societal mechanisms of control. This essay will outline three historical mechanisms of social control (Christian demonology, classic criminology and the sciences of the medicalization of social control), and will juxtapose said mechanisms against the backdrop of sadistic pornography as a highly structured, ritualized agency for power and the creation of the â€Å"Other.† The essay will conclude with suggestions for a reduction in social mechanisms of hegemony and the creation of â€Å"otherness,† through an individual reduction in the psychological creation of â€Å"Other.† Christian demonology Christian demonology is an early tactic of the Roman Catholic Church, and a subsequent tactic of the modern-day deliverance-oriented Pentecostal ministries. In the case of demonology, the ecclesiastic power center felt that there was a need to utilize hegemonic tactics by creating a clear enemy in the form of a spirit force given all the qualities abhorred in humans. A clear evil was created for the reduction of deviant behaviors. A study into demonology will render a comprehensive list, given by the Church, of characteristics and activities in humans that create an association or an invocation for a possible demon take-over. Such activities as yoga, martial arts, female prayer gatherings, telepathy, seduction, and divination are all examples of activities that bring about demon possessions in human beings. Often demons are said to be the creators of negative emotions in humans. Many times, the Church would appeal to demonology for the explanation of any perceived deviance in behavior, particularly among women.   The organization (in this case, church) outlines clear behaviors and psychological characteristics deemed as â€Å"offensive† or â€Å"sinful.† The power structure then creates an outside force that has the power to take over the most intimate part of a human being: his/her very soul. The soul is captured by a fictitious being incapable of eradication by the human. In â€Å"The Great Cosmic Mother: Rediscovering the Religion of the Earth† (Monica Sjoo and Barbara Mor), we can see how, through fear tactics, the human being has been placed in a situation of inferiority, and must then appeal to the Church itself for the remedy and the perceived deviance. The female element, the relationship of the human to the all-encompassing reality out there, has become territory of the white male dominating power. The Church, in this fashion, is both the creator and the eradicator of evil, of sin, or of social deviance. Human morality in the Other (the sinner) is created, judged and remedied through the interaction with the power structure. Christian demonology is a clear example of what Stephen Pfohl refers to as â€Å"social control†, stating that â€Å"When effective, social control ritually reduces, expels, or constrains what is other to the dominant organization of power within a specific historical period.† Through the creation of a demon possessive force, Church hegemonies successfully ritualize a categorization of behaving and thinking considered moral, and others that are considered evil, sick, immoral or crazy. This is the creation of deviance. Core rituals and images of demonic social control include the social contract, rational hedonism, and the calculation of pleasure and pain. These are concepts are drawn upon in Stephen Pfohl’s â€Å"Images of Deviance and Social Control.† The social contract, in the case of demonology, there is an implied agreement between the Church and the people, whereby a social order is established. In this sense, people give up some say over particular beliefs, in order to receive the protection of the authoritative body. In this sense, we can see how quickly people are ready to give up rights over action in order to receive a free pass into heaven. Rational hedonism involves an understanding of reality based on the search for pleasure and the avoidance of pain. The calculation of pleasure can be different to differing individuals.   Sexual sadism is an example of this, thus pleasures cannot be judged based on their qualities.   Ritually, the creators of demonology devised an entire host of rituals and images to further enforce the creation of deviance. Exorcism of demons, witch hunts, literature on demons, as well as specific cleansing techniques and remedies should one come in contact with such demons.   (though, again, some discussion of the core images and rituals of this form of social control would be helpful). As you point out, sadism is about domination and humiliation, but Susan Griffin offers a more robust definition of it. This definition involves the (masculine) othering of sexuality, nature, desire, and Eros†¦which, once projected onto the bodies of women, becomes a target of (sadistic) control. Perhaps this process of othering is similar to that you noticed in the demonic perspective. Perhaps, too, the sadistic fear and resulting domination of bodies resembles the medicalization of control over human bodies. Finally, in â€Å"Images of Deviance and Social Control† there are several relevant passages on sadism and these perspectives. See, for example, the closing section of the chapter on the classical perspective and also consider the witch burnings of the demonic perspective. Grade: C+ Please take these comments into consideration and revise the paper. Thank you!! Classical Crminology Classical criminology, an 18th and early 19th century reform to the justice and the prison system, it is associated with authors such as Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794), Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), Samuel Romilly (1757-1818). These philosophers claimed to be advocates of principles of rights, fairness and due process in place of retribution, arbitrariness and brutality within the justice system. Critics of classical criminology claim that the system was a mere cover-up to the more outright systems of torture of the time, replacing blatant and barbaric control mechanisms with more subtle ones.   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Critical criminologists see in these reforms a tool by which the new industrial order of capitalism was able to maintain class rule through appearing to apply objective and neutral rules of justice rather than obvious and direct class domination through coercion.† A part of classical criminology involves Social Control theory, whereby the process of socialization is furthered, building what is perceived â€Å"self-control† and lessening â€Å"anti-social† behaviors either by direct punishments or by more internal guilt-based controls. The Medicalization of Social Control Medicalization can be defined as â€Å"the process by which non-medical problems come to be defined and treated as if they are medical issues.† Recent times have witnessed an explosion of the medicalization of many areas of human experience and pathology. Alcoholism, emotional problems such as anxiety and depression, and even the experience of menopause in women, have been claimed by the medical community to be areas where an allopathic response is necessary. The dramatic growth in the number of categories of mental illness as explained the various versions of the DSM (diagnostic and statistical manual of mental illness) are primary examples. For instance, the current (DSM-IV) version lists impotence, premature ejaculation, jet lag, and caffeine intoxication as mental illnesses. In this sense, many of the body and mind’s processes are given somatic remedies through Western medical processes and medicines. If we think of our natural bodies and the processes that accompany it, we can see that this is truly our most intimate and personal sphere. In the case example of a woman with menopause, here we can clearly see how the medicalization of a woman’s natural hormonal changes are surrounded in discourses of negativity. Women are made to feel as if something is essentially wrong with them. The medical community can then cash in on these feelings of deviance in women, offering a plethora of remedies at a heavy cost. This process, named by Irvin K. Zola, extended the realm of medicine to formerly non-medical areas of life. In its extreme form, it includes social deviance, and even aging, as medical problems. The medical community, as a hegemony, has extended its discourse of power over into the realms of a person’s natural right to even die, making them feel like death itself is a condition of deviance. In this way, yet again, the individual is placed in an inferior state, stripped of power over their bodies ´ natural tendencies. Simply put, doctors are placed within the hierarchal structure as priests or shamans, the controllers of the power, the ultimate oracles for the human condition and the decision makers regarding our bodies as medicine corners more and more areas of our lives.   The medicalitzation of phenomena also follow ritualistic behavior. In much the same way as a priest tells us how to behave morally in order to avoid damnation, and a psychologist tells us how to behave socially in order to avoid imprisonment, similarly, medical doctors and pharmaceutical companies lay claim on bodies by instructing them how to behave in order to be free from disease. This ritual is based on imagery, which comes to us in the form of the mass media. The mass media represents the motivating ritualization force behind medicalization, whereby viewers are constantly being presented with a list of new diseases and the remedies offered to relieve these problems. Unfortunately, many of the so-called diseases are in fact natural processes in the pathway of life. Rituals of Sadistic Pornography as Related to Power Structure Deeply embedded into each of these three previously outlined power structures is an inherent need for group control. This is a reflection of an individual need for control, and of an inherent dissatisfaction with one’s own self. Nowhere can this be clearer seen than in sadistic pornography. In her book, Pornography and Silence, Susan Griffin eloquently describes the process of control in pornography. There need not be pain transpiring between the two people. The essential element is control and humiliation. One must be in control of the other, and own must humiliate the other in this culture to have power over another is a form of humiliation also objectification is a form of humiliation. We can extend this metaphor towards each of the aforementioned structures, whereby hegemony represents the sadist. A simple look into the definition of the two terms reinforces this belief. Hegemony is defined as the dominance or leadership of one social group or nation over another. A sadist is defined as someone who enjoys inflicting pain over another. The very nature of dominance is the clear intent to subordinate another, and in this lies the need for control as seen in demonology, classical criminology and medicalization. It is also the basic structure for any system, whether capitalism, racism, or religion, whereby one imposes power over another. â€Å"Group-ness† is the nature of humans, as well as many animals. We have the tendency to form groups for emotional and biological well-being. Against this backdrop, it is not to say that the nature of groups is sadistic, and therefore grouping is the problem. It is possible to create groups for social cohesion and working together in a way the supports the rights of the individual. This involves a commitment on the part of each individual to only be responsible for his/her own actions. It requires a deep realization, on a psychological level within the individual, that the creation of â€Å"Otherness† will do nothing but further alienate. In this light, we can begin to heal these destructive social devices through an acceptance of the individual right to have ownership of his/her body and processes as well as modes of behavior and expression. Sources (1) Griffin, Susan. â€Å"Pornography and Silence: Culture’s Revenge Against Nature† (2) Mor, Barbara. Sjoo, Monica. â€Å"The Great Cosmic Mother: Rediscovering the Religion of the Earth† (3) Pfohl, Stephen. â€Å"Images of Deviance and Social Control: A Sociological History† (4) Williams, Patricia. â€Å"The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor† Web Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-classical_school http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/tsph/health/society/medicalisation.html Online Dictionary of the Social Sciences. bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl?term=CLASSICAL%20CRIMINOLOGY 7k

The cause of the Six Day War

The cause of the Six Day War The immediate causes of war can be traced back to Soviet plotting. A large parade was planned for Israel Independence Day, but after some controversy, heavy weapons were not permitted in the capital. The Soviets took advantage of the situation and claimed that the reason was because Israel was amassing its army on the northern border with Syria. This information was quickly passed to the Egyptian president who declared a state of emergency and sent troops to the Sinai Peninsula. The claims were debunked but ignored and Egypt continues the troop buildup. In response Israel sent troops and tank companies to the southern border. On the morning of the May 16, the number of Egyptian and Palestinian troops in the Sinai had tripled overnight. Egyptian planes began a reconnaissance of the nuclear reactor in Dimona on May 17 prompting Israel to call up 18,000 reservists. War seemed imminent on May 18 as the Egyptian General in charge of the Sinai forces stated on Cairo radio The Egyptian forc es have taken up positions in accordance with our predetermined plans. The morale of our armed forces is very high; for this is the day they have so long been waiting for, for this holy war (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America). By May 20 more than 80,000 Israeli reservists had been called up to active duty. On May 22 Egypt committed an act of war by blocking Israeli shipping through the Strait of Tiran. Israel made several attempts at diplomacy for the rest of the month and appealed to the U.S. for support. The U.S. rejected a preemptive strike but offered aid in returning access to the Strait of Tiran. By the end of the month the surrounding Arab nations had made several alliances and defense pacts, Israel now surrounded by 500,000 troops, more than 5,000 tanks, and almost 1,000 fighter planes (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America). Israel received word that the U.S. could support a preemptive strike and the newly appointed defense minister, Moshe Dayan finalized the war plan. On June 4, the Israeli cabinet learned that France had issued an arms embargo on the region and once again the U.S. no longer supported a preemptive strike and also issued an arms embargo. The U.S. State department announced that Our position is neutral in thought, word and deed (Bard, The 1 967 Six-Day War). Never the less, the cabinet voted 12-2 for a preemptive strike that would begin the following morning. WAR The Israelis faced a war on three battlefronts, the borders with Egypt, Jordan and Syria. On the Egyptian front the Israelis attacked with unexpected force. The attack was two-phased, phase one was a simultaneous air and ground attack designed to break into the country. Phase two was designed to exploit the success of phase one and attack the remaining forces in the Sinai. Phase one was a complete success, Israel attacked with 90% of its Air Force inventory, more than double what Egypt expected. Additionally the air attack began not at dawn as expected but strategically at 0745 when most of the Egyptian leadership was out of contact in traffic. The air attack first concentrated on disabling the enemy runways then concentrating on bombers and MiG fighter jets before expanding the attack to include all aircraft types and strategic missile and radar locations. The ground attack was a threefold attack coming from the north, east and west. The battles were fought the night before and the morning of June 6 and by mid-day all the Israeli targets were captured. Israel had successfully broken through Egyptian defenses in central Sinai and severely damaged the rest of Egypts defenses. Phase twos purpose was to exploit the success of phase one but due to the rapid success of phase one many Egyptian citizens and even soldiers did not know the gravity of the situation. The Egyptian military chief, Marshal Amer was well aware of the disaster and was unable to maintain control. He began sending contradicting orders to the battlefront before he ordered a complete retreat. After a mere 96 hours the war in the Sinai was over (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America). On the Jordanian front, Jordan had placed approximately 45,000 troops within the West Bank on 10 of 11 bridges into Israel. The morning of June 5 Jordan began an air attack on Israel and Jordan received false intelligence that Egypt had crippled 75 percent of the Israeli Air Force and began an invasion of Israel. Israel did not immediately respond but by mid-day it was clear that a war with Jordan could not be avoided and they began a counterattack. Israel began by recovering land lost that morning during the initial Jordanian attack and then began moving toward Jerusalem. At the end of the first day of fighting the Israel air and ground forces were successful in isolating Jerusalem. The next day Israel continued their assault on Jerusalem and by the morning of June 7 Israel took the last objective of the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism. Israel continued into the West Bank and by that evening both sides agreed to a UN cease fire, ending the fighting and leaving Israel total control of Jerusalem and the West Bank. On the Syrian front, Syria had received false soviet intelligence claiming that Israel was preparing for an offensive. In response to the warning, Syria activated its mutual defense pact with Egypt and began deploying its troops along its 40 miles of border between Israel. On the first day of the war, Syria began air attacks on northern communities and attempted a strike on the Haifa oil refineries. The Israeli Air Force responded by attacking Syrian airbases. The next day Syria increased their attacks and sent two companies across the border. The attacking Syrians were held off by local defenses until the Israeli Air Force responded and pushed them back over the border. By the fourth day of the war on June 8, Syria accepted a UN cease fire but after only five hours they disregarded the cease fire. With a majority of Israeli forced currently in the Sinai and the West Bank, Israel had only taken defensive positions and had not begun an offensive with Syria. This gave Syria the false s ense of security in their positions on the Golan Heights. After achieving victory in the Sinai, Israeli resources could turn their attention to the north. On June 9 the Israeli Air Force began bombing the Golan Heights. By mid-day Israeli ground forced had crossed into Syrian territory. By the next morning, Israeli forces were approximately 10 km out of Quneitra and Damascus radio announced the fall of the city hoping to enlist the aid of the Soviets. However, the tactic backfired and Syrian soldiers in the Golan panicked and fled. By nightfall the fighting in the Golan Heights ended and the Six-Day was over. IMMEDIATE EFFECTS Immediately after the war the Arab nations continued to reject Zionism and vowed to continue to oppose Israel, they demanded no peace deals and no negotiations with Israel. On June 9 U.S. President Johnson offered his five principles for peace in the region. Despite the opposition from the other nations in the region, Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol agrees to use the five principles for future negotiations. Five months later the United Nations Security Council delivered Resolution 242. The resolution was carefully worded to act as a guide for negotiating peace. Shortly after the resolution was passed, Jordan and Israel recognized the resolution. Later Egypt also recognized their own interpretation of it, and continued to state that they would not negotiate with or recognize Israel. Syria refused to accept the resolution and declared it was only another form of occupation (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America). LONG TERM EFFECTS One of the biggest long term effects of the Six-Day War was the number of Arab refugees from the West Bank. Jordans decision to attack Israel caused many Arabs to flee the West Bank into the East Bank in Jordan. When Israel gained the West Bank many Arabs that fled were now homeless. Eventually most of the refugees were allowed to return and prospered due to increased economic growth. After the war Israel began to invest in the infrastructure of the West Bank and created policies that allowed Arabs to move freely over the border. Despite the economic prosperity in the region that lasted more than two decades, Palestinian leadership continued violent attacks that had led to increased Israeli security measures. Israel did eventually return the Sinai to Egypt, giving up many developed towns, strategic military positions and oil fields (Bard, Israel Makes Peace with Egypt). In return for returning the Sinai, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty that has been able to maintain peace for the last two decades. Despite progress with Egypt the other surrounding Arab nations continue hostilities with Israel, with the latest conflict beginning in 2008 along the Israeli-Lebanese border.